Magnetoresistance hysteresis in topological Kondo insulator SmB6 nanowire
Kong Ling-Jian1, Zhou Yong2, Song Hua-Ding1, Yu Da-Peng2, Liao Zhi-Min1, 3, 4, †
State Key Laboratory for Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Shenzhen Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering and Department of Physics, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Quantum Devices, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: liaozm@pku.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0300802) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61825401 and 11774004).

Abstract

SmB6, a topological Kondo insulator, with a gapped bulk state and metallic surface state has aroused great research interest. Here, we report an exotic hysteresis behavior of magnetoresistance in individual SmB6 nanowire in a temperature range in which both surface and bulk states contribute to the total conductance. Under a magnetic field parallel to the SmB6 nanowire, the resistance suddenly increases at the turning point from up-sweep to down-sweep of the magnetic field. The magnetoresistance hysteresis loops are well consistent with the magnetocaloric effect. Our results suggest that the SmB6 nanowires possess potential applications in the magnetic cooling technology.

1. Introduction

SmB6, a Kondo insulator that had been investigated for several decades, was recently predicted theoretically and confirmed experimentally to be a candidate of topological Kondo insulator.[112] In this strongly correlated system, the hybridization of 5f electrons and 4d electrons opens a bulk gap and the spin-momentum-locked topological surface state emerges.[13,14] The spin-texture of surface states has been observed by spin-resolved angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (SRARPES).[1517] Moreover, the Fermi level always lies in the gap by its Kondo insulator nature, leading to the transport behaviors dominated by surface states.[3,1823] The transport properties of SmB6 in a low temperature range have been studied extensively, showing that the surface states dominate the transport. However, the detailed investigations in the temperature range, where both surface and bulk states contribute to transport, are still desirable. In a temperature range from 10 K to 4 K, the bulk channel is gradually closed, and the surface states emerge to remarkably influence the transport properties.

Here in this paper, we report the magnetotransport properties of individual SmB6 nanowire at temperatures ranging from 10 K to 4 K, where the resistance is very sensitive to temperature. A hysteresis loop in magnetoresistance (MR) is observed, when magnetic field direction is along the nanowire axis. When the magnetic field changes from forward to backward sweep, a sudden increase of resistance occurs. Such a resistance jump is detected both at a bias current of , where the MR is negative, and at , where the MR is positive. The magnitude of the resistance variation is proportional to the slope of the resistance–temperature (RT) curve. The experimental results are well understood by considering the magnetocaloric effect (MCE). The backward sweep of magnetic field results in the sample cooling and increase of resistance. The MCE has been reported in many materials with Lanthanide atoms.[2427] Since Sm is also a lanthanide,[28] the MCE may also be significant in SmB6.

2. Experiment

The SmB6 nanowires were grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method in a tube furnace.[29,30] SmB6 nanowires were first transferred onto a Si substrate with a 285-nm-thick SiO2 layer. The Ti/Au electrodes were deposited on individual SmB6 nanowire by electron beam evaporation after removing the oxide layer from the nanowire surface by Ar-ion etching. Four terminal measurements were carried out in an Oxford cryostat via lock-in technique with a current source of 17.777 Hz.

3. Results

Figure 1(a) shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of SmB6 nanowires with lengths ranging from to . The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image shown in Fig. 1(b) indicates that the nanowire possesses high crystal quality grown along the [001] direction with lattice constant ∼0.41 nm. The inset of Fig. 1(b) shows the electron diffraction pattern of the nanowire in the selected area. The SEM image of a typical device is shown in Fig. 1(c). The variation of nanowire resistance with temperature is shown in Fig. 1(d). Below 20 K, the resistance increases sharply with temperature decreasing and finally is saturated at 3 K. The saturated resistances at low temperatures are well consistent with the fact that the bulk state is insulating and only the surface state is conductive. By fitting the resistance at 4 K–10 K, we obtain the bulk transport gap to be about 3.2 meV.

Fig. 1. (a) SEM image of SmB6 nanowires grown by CVD method. (b) TEM image of SmB6 nanowire, with inset showing corresponding diffraction pattern. (c) SEM image of typical device. (d) Variation of resistance of SmB6 nanowire with temperature.

Figure 2(a) shows the schematic diagram of the measurement setup. Magnetic field is directed along the nanowire axis. The bias current is . As shown in Fig. 2(b), the MR curve exhibits no hysteresis behavior at 1.5 K, because the transport is only carried out by the surface states. The parabolic negative MR is observed, which is attributed to the decrease of spin-related scattering with magnetic field increasing.[30] Figure 2(c)2(f) show the MR values of the same sample at 4 K–7 K, respectively. As temperature increases, the magnitude of negative MR decreases monotonically. The negative MR starts to deviate from parabolic curve and double-shoulder structures emerge at 5 T–7 T: the low-field part of the negative MR curve even changes into positive MR. All these phenomena originate from the fact that bulk states play a more and more important role as temperature increases. The topological surface states with spin–momentum locking are responsible for the negative MR due to the spin-polarized transport. On the other hand, the trivial bulk states result in a positive MR.

Fig. 2. Plots of MR of SmB6 nanowire versus B, measured at different temperatures. The magnetic field is parallel to SmB6 nanowire. The bias current is . (a) Schematic diagram of the nanowire device, (b) MR at 1.5 K without hysteresis behavior. (c)–(f) The MR values versus B at 4 K, 5 K, 6 K, and 7 K, respectively. The hysteresis behavior gradually becomes obvious.

It is worth noting that the MR curves show obvious hysteresis behaviors at temperatures ranging from 4 K to 7 K as shown in Figs. 2(c)2(f). The MR hysteresis occurs as the magnetic field reverses from forward to backward sweep. The hysteresis loop becomes larger and larger with temperature increasing. At 7 K, as shown in Fig. 2(f), the sudden change of MR at the turning point from forward to backward sweep of magnetic field reaches as large as 0.3%.

To further investigate the hysteresis behavior, we perform the measurements under a bias current of . At this large current, bulk states can be activated even at 1.5 K and a positive MR is induced.[30] At 5 K, as shown in Fig. 3(a), the MR curve still exhibits slight hysteresis behavior even the MR becomes positive. It is interesting to note that the resistance is still larger in the backward sweep process than that in the forward sweep process. The MR curve at 10 K shows more obvious hysteresis behavior (Fig. 3(b)).

Fig. 3. Variations of MR with B of SmB6 nanowire measured at different temperatures. Magnetic field is parallel to SmB6 nanowire. Bias current is . (a) Variations of MR with B at 5 K and (b) at 10 K. Although the MR is positive, the hysteresis behavior is still observed.

The MR under a magnetic field perpendicular to both the substrate and the nanowire is further investigated. The measurement schematic diagram is shown in Fig. 4(a). With 0.1- current bias, a negative MR is observed at both 5 K (Fig. 4(b)) and 10 K (Fig. 4(c)), which is attributed to the magnetic field reduced spin-related scattering of the spin-polarized topological surface states.[30] Besides the overall negative MR, an MR dip is observed near the zero magnetic field, which results from the weak antilocalization effect. Furthermore, the hysteresis MR under a perpendicular magnetic field can still be observed (Figs. 4(b) and 4(c)), while the hysteresis loop is much smaller than that under a parallel magnetic field.

Fig. 4. (a) Schematic diagram of device; variations of MR with B at (b) 5 K and (c) 10 K of SmB6 nanowire measured at different temperatures with a perpendicular magnetic field and 0.1- bias current. The hysteresis loop is small.

We should first point out that SmB6 does not have a ferromagnetic order, so the hysteresis behavior should not originate from the sample magnetism. We suggest an MCE mechanism to explain the MR hysteresis. When magnetic field is applied, the magnetic moments in SmB6 tend to be aligned and the entropy of magnetism decreases. When the magnetic field is removed, the increase of the magnetism entropy is compensated for by absorbing the phonon energy, thus leading the temperature to decrease. This makes the system temperature in the magnetic field backward sweep process lower than that in the forward sweep process. On the other hand, the SmB6 resistance increases sharply with temperature decreasing from 10 K to 4 K. This is why the hysteresis loop is much remarkable in that temperature range. Moreover, the hysteresis loop shows the same tendency under large ( ) and small ( ) bias current. Because even the bulk states are activated with large current bias, the MCE still exists. Besides, the MCE is symmetric for positive and negative magnetic field, which is also in accordance with our results. Nevertheless, an little MR hysteresis under a perpendicular magnetic field indicates the anisotropy of the MCE.

To verify the mechanism of MCE, we extracted the increments in resistance ( ) at the turning point of 14 T at different temperatures. The slopes of the RT curve ( ) at different temperatures are also extracted. The plot of versus is presented in Fig. 5, which shows a linear dependence. The MCE leads to a change of temperature , thus a change of resistance . This is well consistent with the in the RT curve.

Fig. 5. Plot of versus . is extracted as resistance increases at 14 T with reversing the magnetic field sweep direction at different temperatures. values are extracted from slope of RT curve at different temperatures.
4. Conclusions

In this work, we have observed a hysteresis behavior of MR of SmB6 nanowire at temperature ranging from 10 K to 4 K. When magnetic field is parallel to SmB6 nanowire, the resistance of SmB6 nanowire exhibits a sudden increase at the turning point from forward to backward sweep of magnetic field. We suggest an MCE mechanism to explain this phenomenon. That is, the demagnetization induces a cooling process of the system, and thus the resistance increases with temperature decreasing.

Reference
[1] Dzero M Sun K Galitski V Coleman P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 106408
[2] Dzero M Sun K Coleman P Galitski V 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 045130
[3] Kim D J Thomas S Grant T Botimer J Fisk Z Xia J 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 3150
[4] Baruselli P P Vojta M 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 195117
[5] Chen F Shang C Jin Z Zhao D Wu Y P Xiang Z J Xia Z C Wang A F Luo X G Wu T Chen X H 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 205133
[6] Dzero M Galitski V 2013 J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 117 499
[7] Gabani S Pristas G Takacova I Sluchanko N Siemensmeyer K Shitsevalova N Filipov V Flachbart K 2015 Solid State Sci. 47 17
[8] Zhu G B Yang H M 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 107303
[9] Kim D J Xia J Fisk Z 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 466
[10] Li G Xiang Z Yu F Asaba T Lawson B Cai P Tinsman C Berkley A Wolgast S Eo Y S Kim D J Kurdak C Allen J W Sun K Chen X H Wang Y Y Fisk Z Li L 2014 Science 346 1208
[11] Phelan W A Koohpayeh S M Cottingham P Freeland J W Leiner J C Broholm C L McQueen T M 2014 Phys. Rev. X 4 031012
[12] Wolgast S Kurdak C Sun K Allen J W Kim D J Fisk Z 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 180405
[13] Funahashi S Tanaka K Iga F 2010 Acta Cryst. B 66 292
[14] Frantzeskakis E de Jong N Zwartsenberg B Huang Y K Pan Y Zhang X Zhang J X Zhang F X Bao L H Tegus O Varykhalov A de Visser A Golden M S 2013 Phys. Rev. X 3 041024
[15] Suga S Sakamoto K Okuda T Miyamoto K Kuroda K Sekiyama A Yamaguchi J Fujiwara H Irizawa A Ito T Kimura S Balashov T Wulfhekel W Yeo S Iga F Imada S 2014 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83 014705
[16] Xu N Ding H Shi M 2016 J. Phys.: Conden. Matter 28 363001
[17] Xu N Biswas P K Dil J H Dhaka R S Landolt G Muff S Matt C E Shi X Plumb N C Radovic M Pomjakushina E Conder K Amato A Borisenko S V Yu R Weng H M Fang Z Dai X Mesot J Ding H Shi M 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4566
[18] Zhou Y Lai J Kong L Ma J Lin Z Lin F Zhu R Xu J Huang S M Tang D Liu S Zhang Z Liao Z M Sun D Yu D 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 162106
[19] Lin Z Zhou Y Kong L J Tang D Lu H Z Huang S M Zhu R Xu J Lin F Wang J Liao Z M Yu D 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 165408
[20] Thomas S Kim D J Chung S B Grant T Fisk Z Xia J 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 205114
[21] Stern A Efimkin D K Galitski V Fisk Z Xia J 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 166603
[22] Nakajima Y Syers P Wang X Wang R Paglione J 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 213
[23] Zhou L Ye B C Gan H B Tang J Y Chen P B Du Z Z Tian Y Deng S Z Guo G P Lu H Z Liu F He H T 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 155424
[24] Pecharsky V K Gschneidner K A 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 4494
[25] Pecharsky V K Gschneidner K A 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200 44
[26] Gschneidner K A Pecharsky V K Tsokol A O 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 1479
[27] Phan M H Yu S C 2007 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 308 325
[28] Wolgast S Eo Y S Oeztuerk T Li G Xiang Z Tinsman C Asaba T Lawson B Yu F Allen J W Sun K Li L Kurdak C Kim D J Fisk Z 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 115110
[29] Zhou Y Peng Y Yin Y Zhou W Zhou F Liu C Liu G Sun L Tang D 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 265302
[30] Kong L Zhou Y Liu S Lin Z Zhang L Lin F Tang D Wu H C Liu J Lu H Z Zhu R Xu J Liao Z M Yu D 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 235410